Legal Opinion

In Re Golladay

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided July 15, 2008No. 19-70067PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARY P. GORMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the Court are motions filed in two different cases requesting the Court to “set aside” the debtors’ discharges for the purpose of allowing the debtors to enter into reaffirmation agreements with amenable secured creditors, and then “reinstate” their respective discharges in each case. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds that the relief requested is not authorized by the Bankruptcy Code or Rules. Accordingly, both Motions will be denied.

Golladay Case History

On December 26, 2007, Connie S. Golla-day filed her voluntary Chapter 7 Petition.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. In the Matter of Met-L-Wood Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of Constantine John Gekas, Trustee. Constantine John Gekas, Trustee v. Frederick L. PipinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  5. In re PenrodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Degiacomo v. TraverseCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  2. In re JeneretteUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
  3. In re SiegalUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  4. Pickerel v. Household Realty Corp. (In Re Pickerel)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
  5. In Re GiglioUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API