Legal Opinion

Velop, Inc. v. Kaplan

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 19, 1997PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

COBURN, J.S.C.

(temporarily assigned).

Harry and Tobey Kaplan owned a small farm. While in their nineties, they entered written contracts which gave rise to this complex litigation: one set of contracts involved the sale of their farm to Velop, Inc., (Velop) which, in turn, contracted to sell to another developer, Williamsburg Associates, Inc., (Williamsburg), and the other set of contracts granted Stavola Contracting Company, Inc., (SCC) the right to mine the farm for soil, which it did to a degree far in excess of that allowed by its contract. After…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Dolson v. AnastasiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  3. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Nappe v. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & BonelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Baxter v. Fairmont Food Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Mylan Inc. v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. Fertile v. St. Michael's Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  3. Barrows v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
  4. Travelodge Hotels, Inc. v. Honeysuckle Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
  5. DiGiorgio Corp. v. Mendez and Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API