Legal Opinion

Wood v. Orford

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,070PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the Twelfth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. DaingerFIELD, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Myrick, J.:

A suit was brought upon a promissory note executed by the defendant Mary J. Orford, before her marriage. Robert Or-ford, with whom she intermarried after the making of the note, was joined with her as a defendant, on the theory that a hus*158band is responsible for the debts of his wife contracted before marriage, and the Court below gave judgment against both defendants. From this judgment, the defendants jointly appealed; and on their behalf an undertaking on appeal and to stay execution was executed by Hevcrin and Sweeny, sureties. On the appeal, this Court reversed the judgment as…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Romero v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Nichols v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Shreeder v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Bem v. ShoemakerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Fischer v. BayerOregon Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API