Legal Opinion

Ratoza v. FLAME, INC.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1977No. 416-181, SC 24416PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs in an f.e.d. action tried before the court.

Plaintiffs, as lessors, entered into a lease agreement with defendants in January, 1971. The agreement provided for a fixed monthly rental plus 5 per cent of the gross sales from the preceding month. Both payments were to be made on the first day of each month or within a grace period of 10 days. Prior to the instant f.e.d. action, the parties were having disagreements concerning the lease and had been involved in a declaratory judgment action. As a result, defendants admitted that they knew plaintiffs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hall v. WorkOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Rainey v. QuigleyOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Fisher v. TiffinOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State Highway Commission v. DemarestOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Western Rebuilders & Tractor Parts, Inc. v. FelmleyOregon Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hazen v. Hospitality Associates Inc. (In Re Hospitality Associates Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1980
  2. Washington Square, Inc. v. First Lady Beauty Salons, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Pratt v. McNally-Rathbone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Burnam v. Garon Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API