Legal Opinion
Department of Transportation v. Drack
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 27, 2012No. 1030 C.D. 2011PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge BROBSON.
Petitioner Department of Transportation (DOT) petitions for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records (OOR). 2 OOR’s order granted the appeal of Earle Drack (Drack), in part, and dismissed the remainder of his appeal as moot. Drack sought review of DOT’s response to his request for records relating to a speed control device referred to as ENRADD EJU-91 (ENRADD). Specifically, OOR’s order directed DOT to provide Drack with access to unredacted documents, which DOT had previously provided to Drack in redacted format. We affirm.
The procedural history…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Stein v. Plymouth TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Signature Information Solutions, LLC v. Aston TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Carbis Walker, LLP v. Hill, Barth and King, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McGowan v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth, Office of Open Records v. Center TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- PA Dept. of Ed. v. R. Bagwell PSU v. R. BagwellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Com., Office of the Governor v. P. EngelkemierCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Glunk v. Department of StateCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.