Legal Opinion · Dissent

Geisel v. Pennsylvania State Board of Funeral Directors

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 2000Published

1DissentFriedman, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The question before us in this case is whether the Pennsylvania State Board of Funeral Directors (Board), being a creature of statute, has authority to hold licensed funeral directors vicariously liable for the misconduct of their employees.1 The majority does not address this particular issue.2 The majori*755ty concludes only that the Board has authority to hold supervisors directly liable for failing to perform their supervisory duties.3 (Majority op. at 753-54.) In other words, the majority has determined here that Thomas L. Geisel (Geisel) was negligent, or at fault,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crowell v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. St. Joe Minerals Corp., Zinc Smelting DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Fruit v. SchreinerAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Kleese v. Pennsylvania State Board of Funeral DirectorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Colston v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API