Anita Kay Virden v. Nancy A. Berryhill

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANITA K. V.,1 Case No. ED CV 19-00063-RAO 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND 14 ORDER ANDREW M. SAUL,2 15 Commissioner of Social Security, 16 Defendant. 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff Anita K. V. (“Plaintiff”) challenges the Commissioner’s denial of her 20 application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”), 21 supplemental security income (“SSI”), and disabled widow’s benefits (“DWB”). For 22 the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. 23…