Legal Opinion

Temple Electric Light Co. v. Halliburton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1911No. 2542PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Motion for rehearing of an application for writ of error to the Court of Civil Appeals, Third District, previously refused.

1Opinion of the Court 1

ON MOTION EOR REHEARING.

2Opinion of the Court · RamseyJustice Ramsey

In the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, reported in 136 S. W., 584, will be found a full and substantially correct statement of the facts, on which the judgment of the District Court rested and with reference to which said judgment was by the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed.

On application for writ of error to this court, as originally submitted, we concluded that, as presented to us, and in subjection and obedience to the rule which makes the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals as to the fact's binding on us, we were not justified, on the merits of the case,…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Temple Electric Light Co. v. HalliburtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

4Cited by21 opinions

  1. Parker v. Highland Park, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Union Bus Lines v. ByrdTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Blanks v. Southland Hotel, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Lang v. HendersonTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Camp v. J. H. Kirkpatrick Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API