Legal Opinion

Langville v. Glen Burnie Coach Lines, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 13, 1963No. [No. 91, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

Appellants are a minor, suing for injuries suffered while a passenger on a contract-carrier’s school bus, and her father, suing to recover for her medical expenses.

Appellants concede that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur has no application here; hence the only question involved is whether there was sufficient evidence of primary negligence on the part of defendant or its driver to take the case to the jury. We must, therefore, examine the evidence adduced in a light most favorable to appellants and give them the benefit of all reasonable and permissible inferences to be drawn therefrom.

Appell…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strasburger v. VogelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  2. Hickory Transfer Co. v. NezbedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  3. Moore v. American Stores Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  4. Joffre v. Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Sothoron v. WestCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Peterson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  2. General Motors Corp. v. LahockiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Suzanne E. Tidler, and Helene Mankowitz v. Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  4. Wratchford v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  5. Plitt v. GreenbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API