Legal Opinion

United States v. Bank of Monte Vista

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided June 15, 1978No. Civ.A. 78-W-458PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WINNER, Chief Judge.

In its wisdom, in 1976, Congress enacted 26 U.S.C. § 7609, and the new statute has spawned troubles galore for banks, credit agencies, credit unions, brokers, accountants and lawyers. Congress says that they are “third party record keepers” falling within the ambit of the statute, and, incongruously, they get hauled into court because they have obeyed the law. Worse yet, the government tenders an order requiring them to appear in person just because that most inconvenient method of meeting the statute’s requirements is a little more expedient from the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Kemper Money Market Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. ShivlockDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1978
  3. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena East National Bank of DenverDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1981
  4. United States v. First Nat. State Bank of NJDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1979
  5. United States v. Kemper Money Market Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API