Legal Opinion

King v. Warden, United States Penitentiary

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 9, 1977No. 76-1704PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Circuit Judge.

Respondents, specifically the Warden of the United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, the Regional Director of the United States Bureau of Prisons, and the Regional Director of the United States Board of Parole, appeal from an order of the District Court which requires the Board of Parole to provide all federal prisoners at their initial parole release hearing with examiners “who have not seen or heard or had available to them any of the evidence involved in [an original jurisdiction] classification.” On the narrow issue left in the case we reverse the order of the District…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sidney F. Brown, Jr. v. David C. Lundgren, Warden, Federal Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Kenneth Michael Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. Stassi v. HoganDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1975
  4. Rothman v. Director, United States Board of ParoleDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smaldone v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1978
  2. King v. WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Pope v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API