Rothman v. Director, United States Board of Parole
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES C. Hill, District Judge.
This habeas corpus cáse purports to raise the issue whether the Due Process Clause or the Equal Protection Clause requires that procedural rights toe extended to federal prisoners prior to their classification as “Special Offender” by the Bureau of Prisons. The petitioner, Norman Rothman, is an inmate at the Atlanta Federal Penitentiary. He contends that as a result of his being classified a “Special Offender,” his chances for parole have been adversely affected and that his classification as a “Special Offender” was made by the Bureau of Prisons without the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Catalano v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1974
- Edward Sexton v. Jack H. Wise, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Stassi v. HoganDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smaldone v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1978
- Mayo v. SiglerDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1977
- King v. WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- King v. Warden, United States PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977