State v. Turgeon
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
On September 23, 1991, the defendant, Normand Turgeon, was convicted in Superior Court (Groff, J.) of arson, RSA 634:1 (1986). The defendant unsuccessfully moved to set aside the jury verdict on the ground that the prosecutor’s closing argument improperly commented on the defendant’s failure to testify. For the following reasons, we affirm.
During the defendant’s opening statement, counsel suggested that the defendant was intoxicated and that the fire started by accident. The prosecutor, in the State’s closing argument, responded to the defense counsel’s suggestions of accident as follows:
“The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. Martha Mejia-LozanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Peter F. IngraldiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- United States v. William W. LillyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- State v. BujnowskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. VandebogartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- State v. BoettiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- State v. PaulsenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- State v. LaurentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- State v. HainesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.