Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Hamm
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 15, 1998No. B096786PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARMSTRONG, J.
This case involves the buyer and seller of a used Sarasota Country Coach motor home (the Coach), and the two lenders who provided financing of the Coach. The lawsuit was instituted to determine which of the four parties would bear the loss which was occasioned by the criminal conduct of the dealer, who is not a party to this action. The provisions of the California Uniform Commercial Code have direct application to this unfortunate situation. Because the Commercial Code provisions •were not properly applied below, we reverse the judgment.
Facts
In June 1991, Rick and Liana…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Security Pacific National Bank v. GoodmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- In Re Sunrise R v. Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brasher's Cascade Auto Auction v. Valley Auto Sales & LeasingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Gordon v. HammCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Walden v. Mercedes Benz Credit Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2005