Legal Opinion
Alinsub v. T-Mobile
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided February 13, 2006No. 05-2300 Ml/ANPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND REMOVED CASE
MCCALLA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand Removed Case, filed June 3, 2005. Defendant T-Mobile USA filed a response in opposition on July 12, 2005. On January 19, 2006, the Court entered an order requesting that the parties submit supplemental memoranda on whether the amount-in-controversy requirement under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 has been satisfied in this case. Defendant 1 filed a supplemental memorandum on this issue on January 26, 2006. Plaintiff did not file a supplemental memorandum. For the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Rose M. Clark v. National Travelers Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tom Everett v. Verizon Wireless, Inc., Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Everett v. Verizon WirelessCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Solomon v. Frontier Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021