Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jesse Andrews v. Kevin Chappell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 1, 2017No. 09-99012, 09-99013Published

1DissentMurguia, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the district court’s order granting Andrews relief due to ineffective assistance of counsel at the penalty phase of his trial. ,. Andrews was convicted of three heinous ■and appalling murders. His prior crimes were violent and antisocial. But due to defense counsel’s constitutionally inadequate penalty phase investigation, the jurors who sentenced Andrews to death never knew that he was subjected for two years as a young teenager to brutal, inhumane, and degrading abuse by his state custodians at Mt. Meigs, a segregated reform school for “Negro children”…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Porter v. McCollumSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API