Legal Opinion

State v. Beeson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1967PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The defendant was- convicted of manslaughter by abortion and appeals. The state’s theory was that the defendant procured the abortion and, therefore, was an accessory to the abortion and liable as a principal.

The girl who was allegedly aborted testified that about a week after the abortion she was in pain, went to a hospital and was examined and treated by a Dr. Holsinger. Dr. Holsinger was called as a witness. He was asked by the state:

“Q Based upon the history and upon the— well, before we go into that, may I ask you what your findings were?
“MR. HOWLETT [attorney for defendant]: Now, I…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Lewis v. Baker, Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. CarceranoOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. RohdeOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. MeidelOregon Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. KittelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. State v. ElisondoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API