State v. Beeson
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.
The defendant was- convicted of manslaughter by abortion and appeals. The state’s theory was that the defendant procured the abortion and, therefore, was an accessory to the abortion and liable as a principal.
The girl who was allegedly aborted testified that about a week after the abortion she was in pain, went to a hospital and was examined and treated by a Dr. Holsinger. Dr. Holsinger was called as a witness. He was asked by the state:
“Q Based upon the history and upon the— well, before we go into that, may I ask you what your findings were?
“MR. HOWLETT [attorney for defendant]: Now, I…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Lewis v. Baker, Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. CarceranoOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. RohdeOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. MeidelOregon Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. KittelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- State v. ElisondoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.