Legal Opinion

Lawler v. McPheeters

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7888PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

— Suit by appellant against tbe appellees for the alleged balance due on a promissory note. Answer, denial and payment by George McPheeters. Yerdict and judgment for the appellees.

The only question made here is whether the court erred in withdrawing certain testimony from the jury. The defendant George McPheeters testified as a witness in behalf of himself and his co-defendants, in support of the plea of payment, and, on cross examination, said: “I was present at the residence of Samuel McClanahan, in Salem, on the 26th of March, 1878. Mr. Lawler, Mr. an<3. Mrs. McClanahan and my mother were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stanley v. SutherlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Wilkerson v. RustIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Bennett v. O'ByrneIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sturgis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Wolfe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Lehman v. HawksIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Bradway v. WaddellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Boggs v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API