Legal Opinion

State v. Montague

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1988No. 16710PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

This appeal presents a procedural question concerning reconsideration of a motion to suppress evidence, and a substantive question regarding probable cause to make an. arrest. The appeal was filed after Michael Montague entered a conditional plea of guilty to a charge of possession of heroin. Montague reserved the right to appeal an order denying his motion to suppress evidence seized incident to arrest. For reasons explained below, we uphold the district court’s ruling on the suppression motion and we affirm the judgment of conviction.

The underlying facts may be stated…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. OrtizSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. Leonard G. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Michael RabbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Rubin Boris ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Montalvo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. State v. RoeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. State v. EmoryIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State v. CarrIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State of Idaho, Department of Transportation v. Marvin GibbarIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API