Legal Opinion

State v. Salazar

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1997No. 17675PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

APODACA, Judge.

1. Defendant appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment against him on double jeopardy grounds. He argues that the trial court abused its discretion in declaring a mistrial due to a manifest necessity because of juror disability. The mistrial was declared after the jury had already been sworn and seated for Defendant’s trial. We are unpersuaded that the trial court abused its discretion and therefore affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

2. Defendant was indicted on multiple drug charges. A jury was selected and sworn on the day set for trial. No…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. AttawayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. LankfordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FosterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. State v. RodriguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. State v. YazzieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. VanderdussenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API