New England Furniture & Carpet Co. v. Catholicon Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South Dakota.
1Opinion of the Court
THAYER, Circuit Judge.
This is an action -in replevin, which was brought by the Catholicon Company, the defendant in error, against the New England Furniture & Carpet Company, the plaintiff in error, hereafter called the “Furniture Company,” to recover the possession of certain hotel, furniture. The property in controversy was originally bought by the Catholicon Hot Springs Company of the furniture company, in February, 1893, and two notes, aggregating $1,750, made by third parties, were indorsed and delivered to the furniture company in part payment therefor, the understanding being that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gird v. California Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1894
- Price v. PankhurstCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
- Park Bros. & Co. v. BushnellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1894
- St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Bracken v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- New Dunderberg Min. Co. v. OldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Hodge v. Chicago & A. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Western Assur. Co. of Toronto v. PolkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Repauno Chemical Co. v. Victor Hardware Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- United States v. SidenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.