Legal Opinion

Shultz v. Morgan

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 23, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Memorandum. — Error from Kingman district court; S. W. Leslie, judge. Action by Joseph Shultz and W. L. Lenhart against H. P. Morgan to recover a penalty for failure to release a mortgage. A demurrer to plaintiffs’ evidence was sustained, and they bring the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cole, J. :

Plaintiffs in error brought an action in the district court of Kingman county against the defendant in error, H. P. Morgan, to recover a penalty and a reasonable attorney’s fee for the failure to discharge a real-estate mortgage which had been fully paid. Prom a ruling of the court, sustaining a deftiurrer to the evidence and rendering judgment for said Morgan for costs, they bring the case here for review. This action is brought under chapter 68, General Statutes of 1868, as amended by chapter 175, Laws of 1889, (¶3892 ef seq., Gen. Stat. of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. EaglesonIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Elmer F. Bagley Investment Co. v. MerrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Ashley v. FrameCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
  4. SS "SAN MARCO IV"Board of Immigration Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API