Application of John W. Hession, Jr
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1DissentSmith, Judge
To the extent this case involves what has been termed “the doctrine of election,” I agree with the dissenting opinion written by Judge Rich. In my opinion, however, this ease does not present an issue of “election,” 1 but presents in*956stead a more fundamental issue, namely, to what extent can a rule of administrative expediency such as Patent Office Rule 78(b) be employed by the Commissioner of Patents to avoid the duties expressly imposed on him by 35 U.S.C. § 135. The more precise issue here being whether under the circumstances of this ease the Commissioner of Patents, by the promulgation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Steinmetz v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Albert v. Martin Custom Made Tires Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Cook v. Commercial Casualty Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Banner Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953