Legal Opinion · Dissent

Application of John W. Hession, Jr

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 21, 1961No. Patent Appeal 6589Published

1DissentSmith, Judge

To the extent this case involves what has been termed “the doctrine of election,” I agree with the dissenting opinion written by Judge Rich. In my opinion, however, this ease does not present an issue of “election,” 1 but presents in*956stead a more fundamental issue, namely, to what extent can a rule of administrative expediency such as Patent Office Rule 78(b) be employed by the Commissioner of Patents to avoid the duties expressly imposed on him by 35 U.S.C. § 135. The more precise issue here being whether under the circumstances of this ease the Commissioner of Patents, by the promulgation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Steinmetz v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Albert v. Martin Custom Made Tires Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. Cook v. Commercial Casualty Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  4. Banner Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API