Legal Opinion

Lipper Mfg. Co. v. American Brand Trimming, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 2, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KNOX, District Judge.

If the law, as it has been declared, permitted, I should be disposed to hold that defendant’s ownership and exploitation of Steinberg’s patent, No. 1,664,271, of March 27, 1928, had worked an estoppel of the defense of noninvention here interposed to the alleged infringement of Lipper patent, No. 1.661,141. of February 28, 1928, for a bandeau. While the record is open to a fairly strong inference that Steinberg’s idea for his net was not original, but was brought to him by the sales manager of defendant, who had probably seen the Lipper net, the facts before the court are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haughey v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Dalby v. LynesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1894
  3. Dalton v. JenningsSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Steel Protected Concrete Co. v. Central Improvement & Contracting Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Veaux v. Southern Oregon Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API