Legal Opinion

Zumbro v. Parnin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1895No. 17,408PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Allen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

In the circuit court the appellants sought to establish a public drain, making the appellees, excepting Noah Knepper, parties. Within ten days after the petition was docketed as an action said Knepper appeared, and, upon application in writing, was made a party defendant, without any objection whatever from the petitioners. Within the time allowed the appellees, including Knepper, filed a remonstrance against the establishment of the proposed drain, and constituting two-thirds in number of all the parties to the proceeding, they prayed the dismissal of the petition. At the next term of court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crume v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Indianapolis & Cumberland Gravel Road Co. v. State ex rel. FlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Young v. WellsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Troyer v. DyarIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Yancey v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Thorn v. SilverIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Karr v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. McKEE v. HASLERIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Cambria Iron Co. v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Pottlitzer v. Citizens Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API