Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Bowen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1968No. 683PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

The question of law presented by this appeal is simple. Did the Community College Planning Board and the Cumberland County Board of Commissioners lose zoning jurisdiction and did the Citjr of Fayetteville acquire that jurisdiction when the area became a part of the city by annexation? The general rule is stated by Barnhill, J. (later C.J.) in Parsons v. Wright, 223 N.C. 520, 27 S.E. 2d 534: “When a municipal corporation is established it takes control of the territory and affairs over which it is given authority to the exclusion of other governmental agencies.” See also Schloss v. Jamison,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Raleigh v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Duke Power Co. v. Blue Ridge Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. City of Elizabeth v. AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Beshore v. Town of Bel AirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  5. Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Orange County v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Davidson County v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Esling v. KrambeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Stillings v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Town of Hillsborough v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API