Legal Opinion

Peters v. Equiserve, Inc.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided February 24, 2006No. 051052BPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Sikora, Mitchell J., J.

INTRODUCTION

The plaintiffs, David Peters (“Peters”) and Catherine Cleveland (“Cleveland”), brought this action against defendants, EquiServe, Inc. (“EquiServe”), DST System, Inc. (“DST”), Computershare Ltd. (“Computershare”), Thomas Lally (“Lally”), and Cathleen Moynihan (“Moynihan”). Plaintiffs allege 1) violations of the Massachusetts Wiretap Act, G.L.c. 272, §99; 2) violations of the Massachusetts privacy statute, G.L.c. 214, § 1(B); and 3) breach of contract based on provis*621ions in the EquiServe Employee Handbook. The parties have presented and argued cross motions…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API