Legal Opinion
Marrie v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 16, 2004No. 03-1265PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
This appeal challenges an opinion and order of the Securities and Exchange Commission denying two certified public accountants the privilege of practicing before the Commission. It revisits the question of whether the Commission has articulated a clear standard for a finding of “improper professional conduct” under Rule 102(e) of its Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.102(e). We conclude that the 'lack of clarity identified in the two Checkosky v. SEC opinions of the court, 23 F.3d 452 (D.C.Cir.1994) (“Checkosky /”),…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,887 Sundstrand Corporation v. Sun Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Patricia Campbell HearstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Princess Cruises, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Howard v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Dorsen v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- The Robare Group, LTD. v. SECCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Rodriguez v. PeakeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.