Legal Opinion

Morley v. Capital Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 12, 1950No. 4-9198PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeflar, J.

The issue in this case is whether the Capital Transportation Company’s “trackless trolleys,” large passenger busses operated by 150-liorse-power electric motors receiving' tlieir energy from overhead wires, are within the taxing provisions of Act 115 of 1939 (Ark. Stats., § 75-206). That Act levies a tax upon all “motor busses (which) are operated on certain designated streets, according to regular schedules, in lieu of street cars, and the operators of such motor busses pay a valuable consideration for that privilege not charged against other motor vehicles.”

The Company sought an injunction…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corporation v. Gus Blass Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  2. Thompson v. Georgia Power CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  3. Holt v. HowardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Memphis Street Railway v. CrenshawTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  5. City of Dayton v. DebrosseOhio Court of Appeals · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reeder v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Capitol Transit Co. v. BurrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street & Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees v. MorleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  4. McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API