Morley v. Capital Transportation Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtLeflar, J.
The issue in this case is whether the Capital Transportation Company’s “trackless trolleys,” large passenger busses operated by 150-liorse-power electric motors receiving' tlieir energy from overhead wires, are within the taxing provisions of Act 115 of 1939 (Ark. Stats., § 75-206). That Act levies a tax upon all “motor busses (which) are operated on certain designated streets, according to regular schedules, in lieu of street cars, and the operators of such motor busses pay a valuable consideration for that privilege not charged against other motor vehicles.”
The Company sought an injunction…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Elizabeth Arden Sales Corporation v. Gus Blass Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Thompson v. Georgia Power CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Holt v. HowardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Memphis Street Railway v. CrenshawTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
- City of Dayton v. DebrosseOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reeder v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
- Capitol Transit Co. v. BurrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street & Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees v. MorleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003