Legal Opinion

Kolas v. LaRochelle

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 15, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

The defendant, a deputy sheriff, attached four cows and three calves as the property of Mathis Kolas by virtue of a writ in which Kolas was named defendant, and Kremer and Parker, creditors of Mathis Kolas, were the plaintiffs. Costantina Kolas, the plaintiff in the present case, is the wife of Mathis.

There was evidence that the cows and calves had been purchased by Thomas Kolas, the plaintiff’s son, and trans*51ferred to her “by bill of sale prior to the attachment”; that at the time of the attachment, August 13, 1925, she “still retained such title as she had acquired by virtue of said bill of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RetkovitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Mercier v. Union Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Davis v. BallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
  4. Allen v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  5. Parsons v. HenryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Douglas v. WhittakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Sluskonis v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Beaumont v. SegalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. Swartz v. Brockton Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Tourles v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API