Legal Opinion

City of Oregon v. Lemons

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1984No. L-83-336PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtResnick, J.

This is an appeal from the Oregon Municipal Court. Appellant, Denny Lemons, was arrested, tried, convicted, and sentenced accordingly for violating Oregon Municipal Code (OMC) Section 333.01(a)(3). This section of the OMC provides in relevant part:

“(a) Operation. No persons shall operate any vehicle within the municipality if any of the following apply: a* * *
“(3) The person has a concentration of ten-hundredths (0.10) of one gram or more by weight of alcohol per 210 liters of his breath; * * *”

Section (a)(3) of the foregoing ordinance is identical in content with R.C. 4511.19(A)(3).…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BlatnikOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Village of Kelleys Island v. JoyceOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Cahill v. Village of LewisburgOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State v. GainesOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API