Rodgers v. Insurance Co. of State of Pennsylvania
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BREWSTER, Justice.
This is a suit (1) on a life insurance policy that insured the life of plaintiffs’ horse; (2) for damages for fraud that allegedly resulted from false representations of defendant’s agent that induced the plaintiffs to accept the policy sued upon; and (3) for damages for negligence of defendant’s agent in issuing plaintiffs the policy sued upon instead of a policy providing a different coverage. The last two causes of action were alleged alternatively. Jay Rodgers and Darrell Davidson are plaintiffs herein and The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania is the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hart v. WaldoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Hood v. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tenn.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
- Fields v. Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. of Conn.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Abraham v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heritage Manor of Blaylock Properties, Inc. v. Petersson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
- Coachmen Industries, Inc. v. Willis of Illinois, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- Walsh v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979