Legal Opinion
Utility Contractors Ass'n of New England, Inc. v. City of Worcester
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 23, 2002No. CIV.02-11877-NGPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GERTNER, District Judge.
This is a case brought under the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV of the United States Constitution to challenge the City of Worcester’s use of a “Residency Requirement Ordinance” in its public works projects. The Residency Requirement Ordinance requires that all private contractors or subcontractors on such projects allocate 50% of their total employee work hours to Worcester residents. The plaintiffs seek a preliminary injunction to stay enforcement of the ordinance while this case is pending.
There are serious issues on both sides of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Supreme Court of NH v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United Building & Constr. Trades Council of Camden Cty. v. Mayor and Council of CamdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Monahan v. WinnDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Metropolitan Washington Chapter, Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Long Term Care Pharmacy Alliance v. FergusonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Doran v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Metropolitan Washington Chapter, Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.