Legal Opinion
Kaufman v. Eisenberg
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 1942PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.
Reconsidered' ruling sua sponte. When this cause was called for trial on January sixth, the court was informed of the ruling in Ex parte Colonna (— U. S. —; 86 L. Ed. 357) that an alien enemy was precluded from prosecuting any action for the duration of the war; the opinion cited Rothbarth v. Herzfeld (179 App. Div. 865; affd., 223 N. Y. 578.) The trial of this action was thereupon ordered stayed until the end of the war, the court being advised -that plaintiff was an alien enemy, being a national of Germany. However, upon further consideration, it appears that the mentioned cases were…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Techt v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Clarke v. MoreyNew York Supreme Court · 1813
- Kershaw v. KelseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Rothbarth v. HerzfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Rothbarth v. . HerzfeldNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Petition of BernheimerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- In re RenardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
- Gruhn v. J. H. Taylor Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1943
- Verano v. DeAngelis Coal Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
- CHEMACID, SA v. Ferrotar CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.