Legal Opinion

In re Renard

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 8, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

Decedent was domiciled in the Republic of France. Her will was admitted to probate in that country. Ancillary letters of administration with the will annexed were issued by this court to the designated attorney in fact of one Henri Couturier, French notary, who was determined to be the lawful foreign administrator with the will annexed of the estate. (Matter of Renard, 157 Misc. 174.) The ancillary representative has accounted. In his petition he requested that the balance of the moneys and properties here accounted for be paid into court for the benefit of said Henri Couturier,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Techt v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Ex Parte ColonnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Rothbarth v. HerzfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  5. Rothbarth v. . HerzfeldNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. In re the Probate of the Will of SchultzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
  3. In re the Estate of ChapalNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
  4. Estate of Bell v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Estate of Bell v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API