Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Tarrant v. Helena Building & Realty Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1944No. 8508Published

1Concurrence

Mr. Justice Anderson,

specially concurring:

In the eases in other states holding the Workmen’s Compensation Law inapplicable there was question as to what the legislature had in mind — whether it intended to deal with contracts of employment that were prohibited by law. As illustrative, I refer to the following:

In Hetzel v. Wasson Piston Ring Co., 89 N. J. L. 201, 98 A. 306, 307, L. R. A. 1917D, 75, a leading case, the court says: “It can hardly be doubted that the Legislature * * * had in mind contracts which were valid in law or, at least, contracts the making of which was not prohibited by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hetzel v. Wasson Piston Ring Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
  2. Wlock v. Fort Dummer MillsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  3. Kruczkowski v. Polonia Publishing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. New Albany Box & Basket Co. v. DavidsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Benner v. Evans Laundry Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API