Tarrant v. Helena Building & Realty Co.
Montana Supreme Court
1Concurrence
Mr. Justice Anderson,
specially concurring:
In the eases in other states holding the Workmen’s Compensation Law inapplicable there was question as to what the legislature had in mind — whether it intended to deal with contracts of employment that were prohibited by law. As illustrative, I refer to the following:
In Hetzel v. Wasson Piston Ring Co., 89 N. J. L. 201, 98 A. 306, 307, L. R. A. 1917D, 75, a leading case, the court says: “It can hardly be doubted that the Legislature * * * had in mind contracts which were valid in law or, at least, contracts the making of which was not prohibited by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hetzel v. Wasson Piston Ring Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
- Wlock v. Fort Dummer MillsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Kruczkowski v. Polonia Publishing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- New Albany Box & Basket Co. v. DavidsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
- Benner v. Evans Laundry Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.