French v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Presiding Justice,
We granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in French v. State, 198 Ga. App. 210 (401 SE2d 67) (1990), and informed the parties that we were particularly concerned with whether “[T]he Court of Appeals properly conclude[d] that Smith v. State [255 Ga. 654 (341 SE2d 5) (1986)] mandates a remand to the trial court?” We hold that under the facts of this case that our holding in Smith does not mandate a remand, and we reverse.
The standard for evaluating an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is quoted from Strickland v. Washington, 466 U. S. 668, 687 (104…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- State v. GoldenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Hance v. KempSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
- French v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Whitner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Mosier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Brundage v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Southerton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.