Brundage v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Presiding Judge.
Gregory Brundage appeals his conviction for the sale of cocaine. His sole enumeration of error is that he received the ineffective assistance of trial defense counsel. Held:
1. “Having reviewed the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s determination, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty of the [crime] for which he was convicted beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979); Crawford v. State, 245 Ga. 89, 90 (263 SE2d 131) (1980).” Witherspoon v. State, 262 Ga. 2…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Sullens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gomillion v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Elrod v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Hardegree v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Forsman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.