Legal Opinion
Automated Systems of Tacoma LLC v. Steris Corporation
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided December 30, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01028Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 AUTOMATED SYSTEMS OF CASE NO. C24-01028JLR TACOMA LLC, 11 ORDER Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 STERIS CORPORATION, 14 Defendant. 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court is Defendant Steris Corporation’s (“Steris”) motion to dismiss 17 Automated Systems of Tacoma LLC’s (“Automated Systems”) second amended 18 complaint. (MTD (Dkt. # 33); Reply (Dkt. # 37); see 2d Am. Compl. (Dkt. # 32).) 19 Automated Systems opposes the motion. (Resp. (Dkt. # 35).) The court has reviewed the 20 parties’ submissions, the relevant…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.