Legal Opinion

In re McLaughlin

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Levy, J.:

Petitioner, receiver of taxes of the.city of New York, seeks to vacate a subpoena issued by David Hirshfield, as commissioner of accounts of the city of New York, and to vacate a writ of attachment issued by reason of his failure to obey the subpoena. He argues that the commissioner of accounts has been deprived by a recent amendment of the Civil Practice Act (Laws of 1924, chap. 216) of the power of compelling the attendance of witnesses; that the local law passed to give him this power is invalid, and even if it is valid that David Hirshfield has not properly qualified for his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Hirshfield v. CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Foster v. KennyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  3. People ex rel. Martin v. ScullyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doe v. KurianskyNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Neff v. FalkNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Opinion No. 68-189 (1968) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API