Legal Opinion

Donahey v. Mattox

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1974No. Appeal, 1765PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

This appeal presents the issue of whether the filing of a praecipe by a plaintiff who unintentionally fails to pay the sheriff’s fee, without which the sheriff would not serve the writ of summons on the defendant, is a commencement of an action which tolls the statute of limitations. We find no deliberate attempt on the part of the plaintiffs to prevent service and, therefore, hold that the action was commenced by the filing of the prae-cipe which tolled the statute of limitations for another 2-year period.

On July 1, 1970, an accident occurred in which the minor plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Ehrhardt v. CostelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Eckborg v. Hyde-Murphy Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Bittler v. Rocco Bono Equipment Rentals, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1966
  5. Wiener v. GemundenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Bernhard Realty Sales Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Med-Tec Iowa, Inc. v. Nomos Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1999
  3. Anderson v. Bernhard Realty Sales Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Anderson v. Bernhard Realty Sales Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Chichester v. Stoner, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API