Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Glass

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 22, 1977No. 54408PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Webb, Judge.

The parties to this case seek against the other money damages for breach of a contract between them, an element of damages being the diminution or loss of equity interest in certain corporations. See Grossman v. Glass, 136 Ga. App. 575 (222 SE2d 64) (1975). On the retrial, the jury returned a verdict for Glass in the sum of $211,350. The Grossmans’ motion for new trial was overruled, and they assert four alleged errors.

1. The first error assigned is that the trial court erred in denying their motion for directed verdict. We do not agree.

A motion for a directed verdict may be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Powell v. Ferguson Tile & Terrazzo Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  5. Kamensky v. StaceyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Simpkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Cohutta Mills, Inc. v. BunchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Kelly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API