Legal Opinion

Garbett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 25, 1986No. Nos. 84-8, 84-47PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants appeal the orders denying their motion to dismiss on due process grounds and their motions for discharge under the speedy trial rule. We affirm.

The three defendants involved in this appeal, along with a number of codefendants, were arrested in a reverse-sting operation and charged with trafficking in cannabis. In the operation, the police used a paid informant to introduce them to a potential buyer. The informant was paid on a contingent basis related to the amount of cash seized during the sting. The informant introduced the undercover police to Milan Holecek, a potential…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Yolman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Healey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Acosta v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Neuman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barclay v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Hughes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Blanco v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. State v. JohnsonCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API