Legal Opinion

Barclay v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 4, 1994No. 92-2540PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant appeals from a conviction of robbery with a firearm, an enhanced sentence of 25 years for a pattern of escalating criminal conduct, and an order to make restitution. He first urges error in the imposition of restitution because of a failure to find ability to pay; second, error in the imposition of enhanced sentence; and third, denial of due process in respect to his request for speedy trial. Save and except a proof as to ability to pay restitution, we affirm. Green v. State, 571 So.2d 571, 573 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Oropesa v. State, 555 So.2d 389 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), rev. denied, 562…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Keys v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Velez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. Oropesa v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barclay v. SingletaryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Barclay v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API