Legal Opinion · Dissent

Monforton v. Northern Pacific Railway Company

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1960No. 10048Published

1DissentJustice Adair

I dissent.

Ernest Monforton, without warning, while driving a pick-up truck, was run down and seriously injured by a Northern Pacific passenger train at a railroad crossing on a country road near Belgrade, Montana. This is a suit to recover damages for the injuries and loss so occasioned.

In its answer, the defendant Railway Company pleaded contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff Monforton. At trial, the district judge, presumed to be a reasonable man, held that the question of the alleged contributory negligence of the plaintiff Monforton, if any, was properly a question for the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Brommer v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
  3. New York Cent. & H. R. R. v. MaidmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
  4. Sun Oil Company v. SeamonMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Hartman v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API