Legal Opinion

Bruce Bereano v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 8, 2013No. 12-6417PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Judge DIAZ joined.

OPINION

KING, Circuit Judge:

Bruce C. Bereano appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of coram nobis. The petition, filed pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), alleged that the Supreme Court’s decision in Skilling v. United States, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2896, 177 L.Ed.2d 619 (2010), requires vacatur of Bereano’s 1994 mail fraud convictions in the District of Maryland. Pursuant to the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, the Skilling decision limited…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. AledamatCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. United States v. Mario BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  3. People v. MendenhallColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. United States v. Rebecca MorielloCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  5. Jose Carlos Gonzales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API