Legal Opinion

United States v. Mario Baker

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 13, 2013No. 12-6624PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY and Judge KEENAN joined.

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Mario Nathaniel Baker was convicted of multiple federal firearm and drug offenses based on evidence that police officers uncovered while searching his vehicle during a traffic stop. Baker’s counsel never challenged the constitutionality of the search, either through a suppression motion or on direct appeal. After his conviction became final, Baker filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 seeking to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence partly on…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Manuel SotoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Hamza KolsuzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Dmytro PatiutkaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  5. People v. RayColorado Court of Appeals · 2015

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API