Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Noghrey

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1985No. A025349PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOLEY, J. *

Kambiz Noghrey appeals from a decision finding valid a premarital agreement. We reverse.

Background

Kambiz and Farima were married for seven and one-half months when Farima filed for divorce. Her petition alleged the existence of an antenuptial agreement setting forth the property rights of the parties. The issue of the existence and validity of the agreement was bifurcated from the dissolution proceeding and heard first.

Frances and Charles Kandel had known Farima for several years prior to her marriage. Farima lived with the Kandels for the two years preceding the wedding.

Mrs.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Newman v. FreitasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. In Re Marriage of DawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Gross v. GrossOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Loveren v. LoverenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. In Re Marriage of HiggasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shaban v. ShabanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. In Re Marriage of LoyaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Dajani v. DajaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Bellio v. BellioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Hunt v. HuntIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API