Black v. Patel
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Justice WALLER:
We granted the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Black v. Patel, 352 S.C. 76, 572 S.E.2d 295 (Ct.App.2002). We affirm as modified.
FACTS
By general warranty deed dated January 1, 1988, respondent Dr. Abraham Karrottukunnel conveyed to petitioners Jagdish and Usha Patel a tract of land for the sum of $460,000. The general warranty deed contains the following standard language:
And the Grantor does hereby bind himself and his Heirs, Executors and Administrators, to warrant and forever defend all and singular the said premises unto the said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jackson v. SpeedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Murchie v. HintonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
- Greer v. McFaddenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Outcalt v. WardlawIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Black v. PatelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sanpete America, LLC v. WillardsenUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Nunes v. MEADOWBROOK DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- Gaede v. StansberrySupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Steven A. Gaede And Ruth A. Gaede Vs. Leslie D. Stansberry And Margery J. StansberrySupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- The Gulfstream Café v. Palmetto IndustrialCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2022