Legal Opinion

Woodson v. New York City Housing Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1961PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

In this action to recover damages for assault, false arrest and false imprisonment, defendant rested entirely on plaintiff’s case. The testimony of plaintiff, which is fully corroborated by that of the Avitness Morris, does not give rise to conflicting inferences, is not contradicted by direct evidence, is not opposed to the probabilities, nor in its nature surprising or suspicious. Under these circumstances, the trial court properly withdrew from the jury the issues of assault, false arrest and imprisonment (Hull v. Littauer, 162 N. Y. *33569, 572; Der Ohannessian v. Elliott, 233 N. Y. 326, 329;…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Hull v. . LittauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Kavanagh v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. St. Andrassy v. MooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Liriano v. Hobart Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  3. Scanlon v. FlynnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  4. Canteen v. City of White PlainsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Dillard v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API